<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cringely, Skype, Open Infrastructure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2006/08/16/cringely-skype-open-infrastructure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2006/08/16/cringely-skype-open-infrastructure/</link>
	<description>P2P, Collaboration, Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:29:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Signal to Noise &#187; Adam Fisk: not a fan of Skype</title>
		<link>http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2006/08/16/cringely-skype-open-infrastructure/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Signal to Noise &#187; Adam Fisk: not a fan of Skype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2006/08/16/cringely-skype-open-infrastructure/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] As it turns out, the developer of Limewire doesn&#8217;t like Skype. Setting aside the obvious history of disenchantment between open-source developers displayed towards their proprietary rival Kazaa, in the early 2000&#8217;s, Adam makes one of the most eloquent arguments against Skype&#8211;one that stems from the way Skype has engineered solutions to networking problems. In Adam&#8217;s view, Skype&#8217;s somewhat secretive approach to NAT traversal and its closed call signaling standard will eventually undo Skype.  The only point I disagree with in Adam&#8217;s post is that he seems to think Skype&#8217;s signaling capabilities CAN&#8217;T be used for anything other than telephony and instant messaging payloads. Adam seems to assume that Skype doesn&#8217;t (and will never) support other media.  Anyway, it&#8217;s a great read, so go check it out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As it turns out, the developer of Limewire doesn&#8217;t like Skype. Setting aside the obvious history of disenchantment between open-source developers displayed towards their proprietary rival Kazaa, in the early 2000&#8217;s, Adam makes one of the most eloquent arguments against Skype&#8211;one that stems from the way Skype has engineered solutions to networking problems. In Adam&#8217;s view, Skype&#8217;s somewhat secretive approach to NAT traversal and its closed call signaling standard will eventually undo Skype.  The only point I disagree with in Adam&#8217;s post is that he seems to think Skype&#8217;s signaling capabilities CAN&#8217;T be used for anything other than telephony and instant messaging payloads. Adam seems to assume that Skype doesn&#8217;t (and will never) support other media.  Anyway, it&#8217;s a great read, so go check it out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
