<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Django and More on Google App Engine with App Engine Patch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/easier-django-on-google-app-engine-with-app-engine-patch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/easier-django-on-google-app-engine-with-app-engine-patch/</link>
	<description>P2P, Collaboration, Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamfisk</title>
		<link>http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/easier-django-on-google-app-engine-with-app-engine-patch/#comment-6418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adamfisk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-6418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hear you Waldemar.  I&#039;ve found that a lot recently -- good business ideas that would probably be successful, but that just wouldn&#039;t be that much fun to run!  If you can create a business that will be both successful and fun, that&#039;s the way to go of course.  That&#039;s what I&#039;m shooting for too -- heck you only live once and all.

You could actually be very successful using App Engine Patch to help stir up interest in your startup too, depending on the business.  I&#039;d expect use of App Engine Patch to go up significantly, especially when App Engine comes out of beta.  Heck, Google might even buy it up.  I definitely think you&#039;ve got something here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you Waldemar.  I&#8217;ve found that a lot recently &#8212; good business ideas that would probably be successful, but that just wouldn&#8217;t be that much fun to run!  If you can create a business that will be both successful and fun, that&#8217;s the way to go of course.  That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m shooting for too &#8212; heck you only live once and all.</p>
<p>You could actually be very successful using App Engine Patch to help stir up interest in your startup too, depending on the business.  I&#8217;d expect use of App Engine Patch to go up significantly, especially when App Engine comes out of beta.  Heck, Google might even buy it up.  I definitely think you&#8217;ve got something here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldemar Kornewald</title>
		<link>http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/easier-django-on-google-app-engine-with-app-engine-patch/#comment-6416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Waldemar Kornewald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-6416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting suggestion. Hmm, haven&#039;t spent much thought on making an App Engine + Django support business, probably because I&#039;d rather build web/mobile apps myself, but who knows. Building a startup and making it successful is very difficult. :(

One of the reasons why we originally decided to release part of our code was because django-helper introduced a new model class. We didn&#039;t want this splitting the open-source community and making code sharing difficult (one group would derive from db.Model and the other from django-helper&#039;s model class). Another reason was that we were very unhappy with how difficult it was to get started with Django on App Engine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting suggestion. Hmm, haven&#8217;t spent much thought on making an App Engine + Django support business, probably because I&#8217;d rather build web/mobile apps myself, but who knows. Building a startup and making it successful is very difficult. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One of the reasons why we originally decided to release part of our code was because django-helper introduced a new model class. We didn&#8217;t want this splitting the open-source community and making code sharing difficult (one group would derive from db.Model and the other from django-helper&#8217;s model class). Another reason was that we were very unhappy with how difficult it was to get started with Django on App Engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamfisk</title>
		<link>http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/easier-django-on-google-app-engine-with-app-engine-patch/#comment-6414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adamfisk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-6414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My pleasure Waldemar.  It&#039;s really helped me out quite a bit, so thank you.  The community seems to be growing just judging from the mailing list traffic, and I think it will only get bigger as App Engine grows.  There&#039;s probably a solid business to build around it if you were so inclined.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pleasure Waldemar.  It&#8217;s really helped me out quite a bit, so thank you.  The community seems to be growing just judging from the mailing list traffic, and I think it will only get bigger as App Engine grows.  There&#8217;s probably a solid business to build around it if you were so inclined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldemar Kornewald</title>
		<link>http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/easier-django-on-google-app-engine-with-app-engine-patch/#comment-6413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Waldemar Kornewald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-6413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot for blogging about app-engine-patch! We really need more people who help build a community.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for blogging about app-engine-patch! We really need more people who help build a community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amre Ellafi</title>
		<link>http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/easier-django-on-google-app-engine-with-app-engine-patch/#comment-6410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amre Ellafi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-6410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You made me happy, i lost passion towards GAE lately !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made me happy, i lost passion towards GAE lately !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dojo 1.2 and Django 1.0 on Google App Engine 1.1.3 &#171; Route 183</title>
		<link>http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/easier-django-on-google-app-engine-with-app-engine-patch/#comment-6409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dojo 1.2 and Django 1.0 on Google App Engine 1.1.3 &#171; Route 183]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamfisk.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-6409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and loading Dojo from Google&#8217;s AJAX Libraries API.  For Google App Engine Patch, see my more recent post.  This area changes quickly, so check the dates on any blog posts you&#8217;re looking [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and loading Dojo from Google&#8217;s AJAX Libraries API.  For Google App Engine Patch, see my more recent post.  This area changes quickly, so check the dates on any blog posts you&#8217;re looking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
